Credentials, publications, financial disclosures, and stated positions — documented equally for every entry.
Public debate about vaccines often comes down to competing credentials: one physician says one thing, another says the opposite, and the public is left to decide whom to trust — usually without access to either person's full professional record.
This registry exists to change that.
The Physician & Scientist Credibility Registry documents the public record of physicians, scientists, and policy figures who have played a meaningful role in vaccine-related research, policy, public communication, or professional debate. Each entry presents the individual's credentials, institutional affiliations, publication record, financial relationships, licensing history, and stated positions on vaccine policy — all sourced from named, verifiable primary documents.
Every person in this registry is documented using the same 21-field template. A government advisory committee member receives exactly the same level of scrutiny as an independent researcher. A physician with extensive pharmaceutical industry funding is presented using the same format as one with none.
Each biography page follows the same structure, organized into five sections:
Degrees, board certifications, current and former institutional affiliations, and research focus areas.
Government advisory roles, legislative testimony, expert witness record, peer-reviewed publications (including any retractions), books authored, patents held, and professional honors.
Industry financial relationships (from public CMS Open Payments data), private business interests and media affiliations, and research funding sources.
Licensing and disciplinary history (from state medical boards and FSMB), stated positions on vaccine policy (in the individual's own sourced words), and media engagement.
The individual's Right to Reply statement (if submitted), and the date the page was last verified against primary sources.
You can browse the full directory, filter by credentials or area of expertise, or search for a specific individual by name.
This registry does not score people or tell readers what conclusion to reach.
It does not label anyone as "pro-vaccine" or "anti-vaccine." It does not rank individuals by credibility, assign trust ratings, or declare winners in scientific disagreements.
Its purpose is to organize relevant professional background information in a consistent, source-based format so that readers can evaluate the record for themselves.
Note: When a field is empty, that information is not hidden — the field remains visible with a note explaining whether the category does not apply, whether no relevant record was found, or whether verification is still in progress. What is missing is as important as what is present.